I think we should change the reason to include wording requiring a minimal example that would reproduce the problem. I've created the https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2201/whats-a-minimum-complete-verifiable-example-mcve-and-how-do-i-provide-it meta post, cribbed from the StackOverflow help pages (an idea I stole from [Vi and Vim][1]), which we can use to request users provide such an example. I propose we update the close reason text as follows:


>Questions about debugging a problem must provide a [minimal, complete, verifiable example](https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2201) of the issue so
that readers can diagnose it without needing to guess, read *all* of your code, or engage in extensive back-and-forth dialog. For more information, see [this meta
thread](https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1537).





  [1]: https://vi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1325/how-to-create-a-minimal-complete-and-verifiable-example