2
\$\begingroup\$

See Strategies to Defeat Memory Editors for Cheating - Desktop Games

Fine question, lots of interest, but closed after 8 years as "too broad". Is that the right action?

Also, it did get edited recently, yet the editor fails to even correct a dead link where the OP posts a link to their discovered answer.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you think the question is not "too broad" and is on-topic? \$\endgroup\$ – Alexandre Vaillancourt May 17 at 4:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also, the question was closed 4 yeras ago, so it makes it 4 years, not 8. \$\endgroup\$ – Alexandre Vaillancourt May 17 at 4:37
3
\$\begingroup\$

Also, it did get edited recently, yet the editor fails to even correct a dead link where the OP posts a link to their discovered answer.

Fortunately, you were there to save the day!

Jokes aside, edits are meant to improve a post; although "Tiny, trivial edits are discouraged", they're not forbidden. It often happens that someone edits a post for something specific and does not check everything. If we forced users to make posts perfect when they edit them, no edits would be made.

Thanks for fixing that dead link!

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .