2
\$\begingroup\$

There are a couple of questions relating to Boo, and they're tagged with .

Can we re-tag them with , or the tag has been removed for a reason not written here and should not be re-introduced?

| |
\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ <Tongue in cheek> Because no one uses Boo. \$\endgroup\$ – Draco18s no longer trusts SE May 19 '17 at 4:04
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ You can take your tongue out of your cheek, that's pretty true. Unity has even removed support for it. \$\endgroup\$ – MichaelHouse May 19 '17 at 6:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Byte56 Just wanted my comment to be clear that I wasn't being entirely serious. I'm sure someone somewhere LOVES programming in Boo. \$\endgroup\$ – Draco18s no longer trusts SE May 23 '17 at 20:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ghosts, for example. I'll show myself out. \$\endgroup\$ – MichaelHouse May 23 '17 at 20:25
2
\$\begingroup\$

There is no simply because noone has created one.

If I had to speculate, I would say that the absence of this tag may have actually led to users using more generic tags, such as . This seems to be further supported by the fact that all questions that reference "boo" were created by new users.

The logical thing to do, here, is simply create a tag. It is a tag pertaining to a specific programming language that is used in game development, no matter how uncommon. There is no reason why such a tag would be blacklisted, and it isn't.

| |
\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .