I often see questions with both and tags (or and ).

To make it a bit clearer, should these questions be tagged with a new ?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Prior discussions here and here. \$\endgroup\$ – Josh Sep 7 '16 at 15:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you have a concrete example of questions that you feel would be able to be tagged better if they had one extra tag slot to use? I feel like most of the time questions at the maximum tag limit have quite a few pointless, bad, or redundant tags on them. \$\endgroup\$ – Josh Sep 7 '16 at 15:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JoshPetrie I edited the question :) \$\endgroup\$ – Alexandre Vaillancourt Sep 7 '16 at 16:14

I am still in support of Tetrad's answer to this question back in 2012. Not all entity systems are component-based, and not all component-based code is an entity system.

Today's "entity component system" is building heavily on component-based concepts that have been in place in software engineering for years, and I think there's value in continuing to allow the distinction between "I am asking about an entity system" (), "I am asking about component-based programming or design () and "I am asking about both" (using both tags).

If anything I am in favor of correcting the description of and (the former is really describing the latter, which itself has no description at all), but otherwise doing nothing.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .