6
\$\begingroup\$

As the title says, do we need the tag ?

At this moment, the tag has only 15 questions, and no usage definition.

The questions tagged are mostly about infinite 2d games, looping content (background), and procedural generation.

\$\endgroup\$
12
\$\begingroup\$

I think we should black list it as it can be applied to a lot of situations, which are not really connected.

And I don't think anyone is an expert in 'infinite'.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ I agree with this. \$\endgroup\$ – Josh Jun 7 '16 at 15:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JoshPetrie All right, I'll take care of it. \$\endgroup\$ – Vaillancourt Jun 7 '16 at 16:18
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't think anyone is an expert in 'infinite' - Ramanujan might disagree. \$\endgroup\$ – MooseBoys Jun 8 '16 at 6:04
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @MooseBoys He'd have to join us :) \$\endgroup\$ – Vaillancourt Jun 8 '16 at 14:55
-2
\$\begingroup\$

Nobody out of game development context knows what procedural is, i bet newbies will search first for "how to make infinite world map in GameMaker" than "Procedural terrain algorithm C++"

implying they even do search

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's not clear to me from this post: do you think we should leave the tag or do we need to remove it? Or replace it? \$\endgroup\$ – Vaillancourt Jun 8 '16 at 10:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think it should stay, if we remove it, newbies will post questions about "infinite generation" with other unrelated tags, this is the closest we can approach "procedural" to "street language" \$\endgroup\$ – PRDeving Jun 8 '16 at 12:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .