Skip to main content
Game Development

Return to Question

replaced http://gamedev.stackexchange.com/ with https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

This is an issue that is bugging me, a lot of the on hold questions can be improved, yet I feel like most people don't get the idea that their questions will be reopened once they are improved. I think it's our fault we are not conveying this idea correctly. And they feel like it won't be opened, so often they vanish from the site afterwards. One example is thisthis, I think it can be considerably improved but it's hard for us to edit it. So can we encourage the asker to edit his question so it can be reopened. I feel like we are not explaining that On Hold doesn't mean closed and can be improved clearly.

This is an issue that is bugging me, a lot of the on hold questions can be improved, yet I feel like most people don't get the idea that their questions will be reopened once they are improved. I think it's our fault we are not conveying this idea correctly. And they feel like it won't be opened, so often they vanish from the site afterwards. One example is this, I think it can be considerably improved but it's hard for us to edit it. So can we encourage the asker to edit his question so it can be reopened. I feel like we are not explaining that On Hold doesn't mean closed and can be improved clearly.

This is an issue that is bugging me, a lot of the on hold questions can be improved, yet I feel like most people don't get the idea that their questions will be reopened once they are improved. I think it's our fault we are not conveying this idea correctly. And they feel like it won't be opened, so often they vanish from the site afterwards. One example is this, I think it can be considerably improved but it's hard for us to edit it. So can we encourage the asker to edit his question so it can be reopened. I feel like we are not explaining that On Hold doesn't mean closed and can be improved clearly.

deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link
House Mod
House Mod
  • 73.3k
  • 15
  • 41

This is an issue that is boggingbugging me, a lot of the on hold questions can be improved, yet I feel like most people don't get the idea that their questions will be reopened once they are improved. I think it's our fault we are not conductingconveying this idea correctly. And they feel like it won't be opened, so often they vanish from the site afterwards. One example is this, I think it can be considerably improved but it's hard for us to edit it. So can we encourage the asker to edit his question so it can be reopened. I feel like we are not explaining that On Hold doesn't mean closed and can be improved clearly.

This is an issue that is bogging me, a lot of the on hold questions can be improved, yet I feel like most people don't get the idea that their questions will be reopened once they are improved. I think it's our fault we are not conducting this idea correctly. And they feel like it won't be opened, so often they vanish from the site afterwards. One example is this, I think it can be considerably improved but it's hard for us to edit it. So can we encourage the asker to edit his question so it can be reopened. I feel like we are not explaining that On Hold doesn't mean closed and can be improved clearly.

This is an issue that is bugging me, a lot of the on hold questions can be improved, yet I feel like most people don't get the idea that their questions will be reopened once they are improved. I think it's our fault we are not conveying this idea correctly. And they feel like it won't be opened, so often they vanish from the site afterwards. One example is this, I think it can be considerably improved but it's hard for us to edit it. So can we encourage the asker to edit his question so it can be reopened. I feel like we are not explaining that On Hold doesn't mean closed and can be improved clearly.

Source Link
concept3d
concept3d
  • 12.7k
  • 13
  • 11

How to encourage on hold questions to be improved by the asker?

This is an issue that is bogging me, a lot of the on hold questions can be improved, yet I feel like most people don't get the idea that their questions will be reopened once they are improved. I think it's our fault we are not conducting this idea correctly. And they feel like it won't be opened, so often they vanish from the site afterwards. One example is this, I think it can be considerably improved but it's hard for us to edit it. So can we encourage the asker to edit his question so it can be reopened. I feel like we are not explaining that On Hold doesn't mean closed and can be improved clearly.