Timeline for Tag suggestion: Reverse-Engineering
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 at 11:24 | comment | added | Trevor Powell | @PandaPajama "Java", "3D", and "DirectX" each can be used to describe a question's subject matter. When used correctly, they identify the context of a question so that the questions can be searched for and found more easily by future visitors. Which is the whole point of tagging. My interpretation of the policy I linked to is that tagging a question with "reverse engineering" or other meta tags doesn't say anything about what the question is actually about, and so doesn't aid in filtering or improve discoverability. | |
| May 20, 2013 at 9:18 | comment | added | Panda Pajama | Not so sure it would be a metatag. If that were true, then "Java", "3D", or "DirectX" would all be metatags when they don't work as the only tag for a question. I'm actually for a "reverse-engineering" tag, as a useful one. | |
| May 19, 2013 at 23:43 | comment | added | Tom 'Blue' Piddock | +1 Best explanation I've seen so far as to if it would (or in this case wouldn't) fit on the site. | |
| May 19, 2013 at 23:43 | vote | accept | Tom 'Blue' Piddock | ||
| May 19, 2013 at 23:44 | |||||
| May 19, 2013 at 1:49 | history | answered | Trevor Powell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |